Why Page Speed Beats Fancy Frameworks

React and Next.js are great, but your users don't care about your tech stack. They care about how fast your website loads.

Why I Built This Portfolio Without React or Next.js

⚑

This page loads in under 100ms. Can your React app do that?

In 2025, every developer wants to build with React, Next.js, or the latest JavaScript framework. But we've forgotten something important: websites should be fast first, fancy second.

100ms
This page loads
30KB
Total size
0
Framework dependencies
100/100
Lighthouse score

The Framework Obsession Problem

Modern web development has become obsessed with tools rather than outcomes. We choose React because "everyone uses it" or Next.js because it's "the new hot thing." But we forget to ask: does my website actually need this complexity?

React and Next.js solve real problems for complex applications:

  • State management across large applications
  • Component reuse in massive codebases
  • Server-side rendering for dynamic content
  • Developer experience with hot reloading

But here's the truth: most websites don't have these problems. Your portfolio, blog, landing page, or documentation site probably doesn't need a full React application.

The Real Cost of JavaScript Frameworks

What Happens
Vanilla HTML/CSS/JS
React/Next.js App
Initial Load
HTML renders immediately
Fetch JS bundle first
First Contentful Paint
~100-300ms
~800-2000ms
Time to Interactive
Instant
After JS loads + hydrates
Total Download
20-50KB
150-500KB+
Memory Usage
Minimal
Virtual DOM + hydration overhead

Every kilobyte of JavaScript must be:

  1. Downloaded (network time)
  2. Parsed (CPU time)
  3. Compiled (more CPU time)
  4. Executed (even more CPU)
  5. Hydrated (for SSR frameworks)

On mobile devices or slow networks, this process can take seconds. Users don't wait seconds. They leave.

What Users Actually Care About

⚑

Speed

Can I see content immediately?

πŸ“±

Responsiveness

Does it work on my phone?

πŸ”‹

Battery Life

Does it drain my battery?

πŸ’°

Data Usage

Will it use all my data?

Notice what's missing from that list? Users don't care about:

  • Whether you used React hooks or class components
  • Your fancy state management library
  • Your server-side rendering strategy
  • Your component architecture

They care about results, not implementation details.

When Frameworks Make Sense (And When They Don't)

βœ… Use Frameworks For

  • Complex web applications (dashboards, admin panels)
  • Real-time collaboration tools (Google Docs, Figma)
  • Large teams needing standardized patterns
  • SPAs with heavy client-side interactivity
  • Applications needing SEO with dynamic content

❌ Skip Frameworks For

  • Portfolio websites (like this one!)
  • Blogs and documentation
  • Marketing landing pages
  • Simple e-commerce product pages
  • Content-focused websites

Modern Browser APIs Make Frameworks Less Necessary

Browsers have evolved dramatically. Many things we used to need frameworks for are now built into the platform:

Web Components

Native component model without frameworks

CSS Grid & Flexbox

Complex layouts without JavaScript

Intersection Observer

Lazy loading and animations

Service Workers

Offline capabilities and caching

Fetch API

AJAX requests without libraries

Template Literals

Simple templating without JSX

How This Portfolio Achieves 100ms Load Times

Let me show you exactly how this simple portfolio beats most React apps in performance:

1

Zero Framework Dependencies

No React, Vue, Angular, or their runtime overhead. Just HTML, CSS, and minimal JavaScript.

2

CSS Grid & Flexbox

Complex layouts done entirely in CSS. No JavaScript layout calculations.

3

Intersection Observer API

Scroll animations without jQuery or animation libraries.

4

Native Browser Caching

Proper cache headers instead of client-side caching libraries.

5

Minimal JavaScript

Only 5KB of JavaScript total. React's runtime alone is 40KB+.

Key Insight: This isn't about being anti-framework. It's about using the right tool for the job. If you're building a complex application, use React. If you're building a content website, maybe don't.

The Business Impact of Speed

Speed isn't just a technical metric. It's a business metric:

  • Google: 53% of mobile users abandon sites that take longer than 3 seconds to load
  • Amazon: Every 100ms of latency costs them 1% in sales
  • Walmart: For every 1 second improvement in page load time, conversions increase by 2%
  • BBC: They lose 10% of users for every additional second their site takes to load

Your fancy React component library won't save you if users leave before it loads.

Practical Advice: Making the Right Choice

Next time you start a project, ask yourself these questions:

The Hybrid Approach: Best of Both Worlds

You don't have to choose extremes. Consider these approaches:

Progressive Enhancement

Start with semantic HTML, add CSS, then sprinkle JavaScript for interactivity.

Island Architecture

Use frameworks only for interactive components, not the entire page.

Static Generation

Pre-render content at build time, add interactivity client-side.

"Choosing simplicity over trends is often the most senior decision an engineer can make. Performance is a feature that impacts every user, while fancy architectures only impact developers."

My Challenge to You

Try building your next project without a framework. Start with HTML and CSS. Add JavaScript only when you need it. You might be surprised by:

  • How much faster it loads
  • How much smaller the bundle is
  • How much easier debugging becomes
  • How much better it performs on low-end devices

This portfolio proves that for many use cases, vanilla web technologies still provide the best user experience. It loads instantly, works everywhere, and costs nothing to host.

Remember: Your users judge your website by how it feels, not by how it's built. A fast, simple website will always beat a slow, complex oneβ€”no matter how fancy the technology behind it.